Why do we post our reports on the internet?
This keeps all the readers HONEST. That way no one can MISREAD or MIS QUOTE any information provided in our report. We're proud of our work. Today I donated over $1600.00 in services to this case.
International K 9 Search and Rescue Services.
Office of Emergency Management
P.O. Box # 1472 Longview, Wa. 98632
Office 360-414-8093 Mobile 503-705-0258
Email: searchdog@iinet.com Web: www.k9sardog.com
I.K.9.S.A.R.S. Case # 2010-6608-355.
SUMMARY:
On 11-18-2010, I.K.9.S.A.R.S. performed a private search for a missing person near Detroit Lake, Oregon. USA.
MENTIONED:
Bend Police Dept. (Investigating agency)
Marion County Sheriff’s Department
Lori Blaylock (Missing person) SEE BPD Notice re: Description.
Harry Oakes (Dog Handler) SAR Dog Willow K-9-1 SAR Dog Tyler K-9-1A.
ACTION TAKEN:
On 11-15-2010 BPD and M.C.S.O. asked for the public’s help to find Lori.
On 11-18-2010 0630hrs. I drove to Hwy 22 Santiam River via I-5 and checked
Santiam Flats.
I introduced both search dogs Willow and Tyler to Sigma Psuedo scent minus 30 days, and gave my Search dogs the work command “Go find the body”.
Both search dogs gave minor alerts at the river’s edge.
Winds from the west at 15 mph. Rain mixed with snow. Temp 34F.
I worked East up river to Bruno Mt Rd. Strong Death alerts by both search dogs independent of one another along the waters edge. Santiam River.
1115hrs. Hwy 22 MP 65 More Alerts coming from upstream. Dogs very depressed and alerts were extremely strong.
1130 USFS Rd 2234 and Hwy 22 More alerts coming from Up river.
1345hrs. MP 69 No Alerts. Winds shifted direction.
1930hrs. Returned to office and wrote this report.
Based on SAR Dog Willow and SAR Dog Tylers tracking record, there is less then a .0001% chance that they are wrong on their alerts.
EVIDENCE:
1). My report and testimony regarding scent, scent evidences, my search dogs
track is admissible in any court of law.
SCENT EVIDENCE:
Search dogs give three types of alerts. Live, stress, or dead.
Live alert. Dogs ears are up, tails up, dog smiling, happy, barking,
Stress alert. Dog’s ears up, tail half way down, dog barking.
Death alert. Dog’s ears down, very sad, emotionally upset, tail down, dog
whining. Eating grass to settle their upset stomachs.
STATEMENTS:
Harry Oakes (K9 dog handler) 11-18-2010. With the search conducted on
11-18-2010, this searched showed me that both search dogs are indicating
on a dead human and the scent is being carried by the river currents down stream.
This does not mean the deceased victim is in the water. With the rain and snow, the water runoff can carry the death scent down to the river from the victim’s position and cause the dogs to alert in the water. Neither search dog would drink from the water. Both search dogs would give their standard death alert regarding dead humans. Both have documented finding live and dead humans before today’s search.
Since I don’t have a scent article belonging to Lori Blaylock there is no way to know whether this is Lori’s death scent or someone else dead in the area.
If this is Lori’s scent the search dogs are alerting on and if she is in fact in the water, her remains should be surfacing within the next 5 days unless she caught in a strainer or debris pile.
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
Have your local search teams walk this section checking for human remains thrown over a steep embankment along hwy 22 or into the Santiam River. Start from MP 70 and work down to 64.
Or give me access to the scent article of Lori so that I can qualify if this is her death scent or someone else’s the search dogs are alerting on.
Respectfully
Mr. Harry E. Oakes Jr. K-9-1.
International K-9 Search and Rescue Coordinator.
Handler / Instructor. BPST#9863.
1-cc- Files.
www.k9sardog.com
Showing posts with label International K9 Search and Rescue Services. Show all posts
Showing posts with label International K9 Search and Rescue Services. Show all posts
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Search for Lori Blaylock
From: International K9 Search and Rescue Services
PO Box# 1472 Longview, Washington 98632 USA
Office; 360-414-8093
Mobile: 503-705-0258
Email: searchdog@iinet.com
Web; www.k9sardog.com
11-14-2010-11-14
To: Marion County Sheriff’s Department Attention Homicide Detectives
C/O PO Box 14500 Salem, OR 97309
and
Bend Police Dept. attention Homicide Detectives C/O BPD 711 N.W. BONO ST.
Bend, OR
RE: Finding Lori Blaylock's remains.
In the news you are asking for the public’s help in locating Lori’s remains.
I’m going to give you some suggestions and I hope you listen to me. This may help resolve your search efforts for Lori.
First there may have been enough scent that escaped from the Isuzu Trooper and or the Utility trailer that your suspect Steven Blaylock drove for a search dog to track the scent escaping from the vehicle / trailer.
As a person drives along scent escapes. Depending on the year and make of vehicle there may be a lot of scent or very little scent escaping along the drive route.
To follow Lori’s scent trail escaping from the suspects vehicle, get an uncontaminated scent article belonging to Lori and have the search dog handler introduce it to a scent discriminating tracking dog.
Then track the scent from the residence (PLS) Point last seen and see where the scent trail ends. Drive to each intersection and trust the dog. Follow the route to the end.
This is a long process and safety is the # 1 factor here for the dog and handler.
If the scent trail of Lori ends in the N. Santiam River as you are putting out there for the public to search, then have your dog work from Detroit lake up stream. He / she get’s out of their vehicle with their search dog and lets them smell the river. One search up river every mile from the Detroit lake.
If Lori’s remains are in the water or even near the water, the search dog will alert.
Then you will know her remains are upstream from that location. Work up stream until the search dog quit’s alerting and that is your area of highest probability.
If there are no alerts then either you have bad information or you are searching in the wrong area.
If this technique doesn’t work then get the scent of your suspect and try doing the same thing.
Work from Detroit lake. If he spent any time burying her remains or weighting her down so she wont surface, then his scent will be escaping from the victim and the crime scene as well.
I’ve used both these techniques in the past to find remains of the victim and or to track the suspect’s route.
I hope this helps.
If you need our services let me know and we’ll be happy to send you a contract for services agreement.
Respectfully
Mr. Harry Oakes
Forensic Scent evidence instructor.
SAR Coordinator.
I.K.9.S.A.R.S.
1-cc-Files.
PO Box# 1472 Longview, Washington 98632 USA
Office; 360-414-8093
Mobile: 503-705-0258
Email: searchdog@iinet.com
Web; www.k9sardog.com
11-14-2010-11-14
To: Marion County Sheriff’s Department Attention Homicide Detectives
C/O PO Box 14500 Salem, OR 97309
and
Bend Police Dept. attention Homicide Detectives C/O BPD 711 N.W. BONO ST.
Bend, OR
RE: Finding Lori Blaylock's remains.
In the news you are asking for the public’s help in locating Lori’s remains.
I’m going to give you some suggestions and I hope you listen to me. This may help resolve your search efforts for Lori.
First there may have been enough scent that escaped from the Isuzu Trooper and or the Utility trailer that your suspect Steven Blaylock drove for a search dog to track the scent escaping from the vehicle / trailer.
As a person drives along scent escapes. Depending on the year and make of vehicle there may be a lot of scent or very little scent escaping along the drive route.
To follow Lori’s scent trail escaping from the suspects vehicle, get an uncontaminated scent article belonging to Lori and have the search dog handler introduce it to a scent discriminating tracking dog.
Then track the scent from the residence (PLS) Point last seen and see where the scent trail ends. Drive to each intersection and trust the dog. Follow the route to the end.
This is a long process and safety is the # 1 factor here for the dog and handler.
If the scent trail of Lori ends in the N. Santiam River as you are putting out there for the public to search, then have your dog work from Detroit lake up stream. He / she get’s out of their vehicle with their search dog and lets them smell the river. One search up river every mile from the Detroit lake.
If Lori’s remains are in the water or even near the water, the search dog will alert.
Then you will know her remains are upstream from that location. Work up stream until the search dog quit’s alerting and that is your area of highest probability.
If there are no alerts then either you have bad information or you are searching in the wrong area.
If this technique doesn’t work then get the scent of your suspect and try doing the same thing.
Work from Detroit lake. If he spent any time burying her remains or weighting her down so she wont surface, then his scent will be escaping from the victim and the crime scene as well.
I’ve used both these techniques in the past to find remains of the victim and or to track the suspect’s route.
I hope this helps.
If you need our services let me know and we’ll be happy to send you a contract for services agreement.
Respectfully
Mr. Harry Oakes
Forensic Scent evidence instructor.
SAR Coordinator.
I.K.9.S.A.R.S.
1-cc-Files.
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
How to find human remains in a landfill
The other day the TV Show Nancy Grace asked me to come on the air and talk about how search dogs are used to find human remains in landfills.
With the search for 10-year-old Zahra Baker turning to the landfill and with one of my team members having to work another missing person’s case in a landfill near her home in Kentucky, I decided to write the proper way to search a landfill with a search dog.
First obtain a map from the landfill site manager of where the suspect(s) trash would have been dumped in what part of the landfill.
Next make sure all of your search team members, support team members are all up to date on their tetnus and hep ABCDEF shots,
Searcher attire. Heavy lugged soled boots, thick wool socks, coveralls or body recovery disposable overalls, face mask, safety glasses, hat to protect from the rain/heat. Safety gloves. Also bring a complete change of clothing for returning home or back to the office.
Your own day pack with the ten essentials. First aid, water, note book, write anywhere pen/pencil, compass, camera, toilet paper,food, hand cleaner, pocket knife, etc.
Next have the land fill owner / operator take a heavy machinery cat and expose the area to be searched with the cat. Pick up the suspected areas and pile them into several workable searchable piles about five feet high.
Note there are many hazards in working a landfill. Poisonous snakes eatting the rats which are eatting the body parts. There’s broken glass, sharp metal, hazardous bio waste from the hospitals and clinics, hazardous cleaning supplies just to name some of the crap you’ll find in the landfill.
Next place a little VICKS in your nose to numb up the horrendous nasty smells of decomposing compost, bodies, animals, dirty diapers, food, etc that you are going to have to smell. Try not to get any maggots in your mouth they taste nasty unless you have some tabasco sauce to go with them. (Just joking).
Before you search, try to get a scent article of the missing person. Try not to use psuedo scent as your dog will be going nuts with all the decomposing human waste, body parts discarded by medical facitlities, fetus, afterbirth, etc.
This way your dog will only focus on just the victim(s) scent and nothing else.
Work your search like you would a disaster site. Slow methodical and check each pile or section into the wind. If you dog alerts, pull back and let your ground teams rake out the pile and see what is in there.
Have your diagramer or evidence officer note the date, time, location, grid of the find, should you make a successful find.
This is why each time I get a missng persons report across my desk I plead with the family, friends of the family, search and rescue teams, law enforcement teams to immediately go check all local area dumptsers immediately. It’s not uncommon for a bad person to dump the victim in a dumptser.
It’s a lot easier to search early on, then having to go through a landfill for weeks on end to try and weed through the trash and hazourdous materials to find human remains.
After you’ve searched for the day, make sure you change into an entirely different change of clothing and footware.
Make sure you bath when you get home and bath your dog from nose to tail. Also check your dog for cuts, abrasions, puncture wounds etc.
Also make sure you end each day with a live runaway find for your dog away from the search area to end the day for your dog on a positive note.
Good luck, work slow and be safe.
Respectfully
Mr. Harry Oakes.
SAR Coordinator I.K.9.S.A.R.S.
With the search for 10-year-old Zahra Baker turning to the landfill and with one of my team members having to work another missing person’s case in a landfill near her home in Kentucky, I decided to write the proper way to search a landfill with a search dog.
First obtain a map from the landfill site manager of where the suspect(s) trash would have been dumped in what part of the landfill.
Next make sure all of your search team members, support team members are all up to date on their tetnus and hep ABCDEF shots,
Searcher attire. Heavy lugged soled boots, thick wool socks, coveralls or body recovery disposable overalls, face mask, safety glasses, hat to protect from the rain/heat. Safety gloves. Also bring a complete change of clothing for returning home or back to the office.
Your own day pack with the ten essentials. First aid, water, note book, write anywhere pen/pencil, compass, camera, toilet paper,food, hand cleaner, pocket knife, etc.
Next have the land fill owner / operator take a heavy machinery cat and expose the area to be searched with the cat. Pick up the suspected areas and pile them into several workable searchable piles about five feet high.
Note there are many hazards in working a landfill. Poisonous snakes eatting the rats which are eatting the body parts. There’s broken glass, sharp metal, hazardous bio waste from the hospitals and clinics, hazardous cleaning supplies just to name some of the crap you’ll find in the landfill.
Next place a little VICKS in your nose to numb up the horrendous nasty smells of decomposing compost, bodies, animals, dirty diapers, food, etc that you are going to have to smell. Try not to get any maggots in your mouth they taste nasty unless you have some tabasco sauce to go with them. (Just joking).
Before you search, try to get a scent article of the missing person. Try not to use psuedo scent as your dog will be going nuts with all the decomposing human waste, body parts discarded by medical facitlities, fetus, afterbirth, etc.
This way your dog will only focus on just the victim(s) scent and nothing else.
Work your search like you would a disaster site. Slow methodical and check each pile or section into the wind. If you dog alerts, pull back and let your ground teams rake out the pile and see what is in there.
Have your diagramer or evidence officer note the date, time, location, grid of the find, should you make a successful find.
This is why each time I get a missng persons report across my desk I plead with the family, friends of the family, search and rescue teams, law enforcement teams to immediately go check all local area dumptsers immediately. It’s not uncommon for a bad person to dump the victim in a dumptser.
It’s a lot easier to search early on, then having to go through a landfill for weeks on end to try and weed through the trash and hazourdous materials to find human remains.
After you’ve searched for the day, make sure you change into an entirely different change of clothing and footware.
Make sure you bath when you get home and bath your dog from nose to tail. Also check your dog for cuts, abrasions, puncture wounds etc.
Also make sure you end each day with a live runaway find for your dog away from the search area to end the day for your dog on a positive note.
Good luck, work slow and be safe.
Respectfully
Mr. Harry Oakes.
SAR Coordinator I.K.9.S.A.R.S.
Friday, October 29, 2010
Why I went private in Search and Rescue.
Today one of my dog handlers and I had a long talk about the frustrations of not being a part of the sheriff’s office search and rescue teams. She asked me, “why I separated myself and went private?”. I’ve had several folks ask me this question so I’ll try to answer this.
From 1972 through 1997, (25 years) I worked within the law enforcement’s resources to do the best job I could. After working as a search and rescue coordinator for the sheriff’s office along with my military background as well as, at that time- 11 years of K9 SAR experience, I was seeing a pattern form where I in good conscience couldn’t standby any more and keep my mouth shut to be one of the “Good old boys”.
I was trained to do search and rescue the right way. By some old sheriff’s and SAR Folks who knew what they were doing. Here’s what I was taught.
When a call came in regarding a missing person, I would send a deputy out to confirm that this was a legit call.
They would make sure we (the sheriff’s office) had the right person identified as missing. They would also see if there was any foul play or if this was just a “Runaway” issue.
SAR cost money and by determining these factors early on, this could save the department lots of time and money.
Once we established that this was a legitimate call, while the deputy was gathering personal information on the missing person, name, date of birth, medical records, medical history, mental history, work, school, family structure history, the physical identifiers such as height, hair color and length, eye color, did this person wear glasses or contacts, smoke or not smoke, drugs or no drugs, alcohol or no alcohol involved, clothing description, type of clothing last seen in. Their weight, physical identifiers, etc, the who, what, when, where, why, and how of the case info.
I would then send in a search dog team to determine the following:
Is this really a missing person’s case or a homicide or suicide? Does it support the reporting persons statement or contradict it?
The search dog team if properly trained, can determine if this person was murdered and the scene was being compromised by the suspect(s) involved to cover up the murder.
I’ve helped solved several murders like this over the year. The Carlson’s in Battleground, Little Tommy Gibson who we were able to determine was killed by his father who was a deputy sheriff in Douglas County, Ore. And several others.
Anyway, if there are no signs of foul play, stress or death scent in and around the home, and point last seen.
Then the search dog team would determine (track the missing persons scent trail and determine if the victim walked on their own in a specific direct and got into a vehicle, on a bus, or was killed and their body ditched in the area or removed out of the area.
Depending on the search dog teams findings, I could then direct the detectives on how I would suggest they proceed from this point on. By then the police detectives would know
If this was a willful disappearance, or a kidnapping homicide case. Both need to be investigated very differently.
Do we bring in helicopters, more search dogs, cadaver dog teams, air scent teams, ground teams, and where do we use them. Do we set up containment?
By doing this I documented with the sheriff’s department a 97% success rate of finding the victim or finding out what really happened to the victim.
The bottom line is that I used my resources as I was trained to do properly.
Throughout the 25 years I learned that if I kept my mouth shut and turned the other way when a police dept screwed up and didn’t use their resources properly costing the missing person their life, I would be in with the “Good old boys” and all was well with the world.
At first of course when I saw this happen, I would complain to my superiors and they would just say, “Well Oakes, shit happens, it’s out of our control”.
I would argue that this needed to be changed so we, “the good old boys”, who were sworn to serve and protect” would provide the most professional teams and services to the public.
I would argue that we owed it to the missing person and his / her family and friends to do everything right.
After seeing several people lose their life because a certain sheriff’ refused to use a search dog or call in proper resources and it was all being covered up, I had had enough. Especially with the Nathen Madsen and Derrick Englebretson Case in Klamath County, Ore.
I could no longer just sit by and keep my mouth shut.
That’s why I then testified in the Oregon Legislature against the very departments I worked with and why I was promptly kicked out of the Oregon State Sheriff’s Association and State of Washington Dept of Emergency Management as an official resource.
I found that these sheriffs office SAR teams badmouthed me to make themselves look better. They badmouthed me to other sheriff’s depts., the victims families in hopes the victim’s family wouldn’t use me so that I wouldn’t show up the departments by finding the missing person when the police couldn’t or wouldn’t.
I still respect most law enforcement officials and their work. It’s a hard difficult job.
I respect the men and women who wear the badge. It’s when they abuse their authority that I have an issue and will stand up and take them on legally.
So after I went private in 1997, 13 years ago, I’ve found I have much more latitude as a private search team. Of course I have to obey all state laws and local rules and regulations regarding search and rescue, handling of evidence, and human remains etc.
But I also found out that many sheriffs feel threatened by my successes and have taken over the media controlling what the public hears about a specific case.
I can’t change that, nor will I. But what I do have control of is my own ethics and standards.
I still conduct my search and rescue operations with 100% documentation and ethics. This has protected me legally in and outside the courts of law. I’ve been able to bring closure or at least some answers to over 1,605 families. Through consulting as well as through actual search missions.
Most sheriffs appreciate my work. When they call me in, and some still do.
I work for them and make them look good.
If they refuse to call me in and we come in privately on behalf of the victim(s) family, I will do my job, report to the sheriff my findings, and if they become embarrassed because we found the victim in the original search area when their teams didn’t, couldn’t or wouldn’t, that’s not my issue, it’s theirs.
So do I regret my decision to go private?
No, I sleep well at night knowing that I’m giving the victim (missing person) and their family 100%.
No cover ups, no Good old boy BS, just the 100% work ethics I took an oath to perform and still live by today.
I get results and that’s all that matters.
Some of these sheriff’s could learn a lot by my methods. If they really wanted to.
So now maybe you as the general public can understand why I work privately and am not well liked by some departments.
If I wasn’t successful, I would be out of work. I’m still doing this job after 38 years.
So I guess what I’m doing works.
Respectfully
Mr. Oakes
Private Search and Rescue Coordinator
International K9 Search and Rescue Services
www.k9sardog.com
From 1972 through 1997, (25 years) I worked within the law enforcement’s resources to do the best job I could. After working as a search and rescue coordinator for the sheriff’s office along with my military background as well as, at that time- 11 years of K9 SAR experience, I was seeing a pattern form where I in good conscience couldn’t standby any more and keep my mouth shut to be one of the “Good old boys”.
I was trained to do search and rescue the right way. By some old sheriff’s and SAR Folks who knew what they were doing. Here’s what I was taught.
When a call came in regarding a missing person, I would send a deputy out to confirm that this was a legit call.
They would make sure we (the sheriff’s office) had the right person identified as missing. They would also see if there was any foul play or if this was just a “Runaway” issue.
SAR cost money and by determining these factors early on, this could save the department lots of time and money.
Once we established that this was a legitimate call, while the deputy was gathering personal information on the missing person, name, date of birth, medical records, medical history, mental history, work, school, family structure history, the physical identifiers such as height, hair color and length, eye color, did this person wear glasses or contacts, smoke or not smoke, drugs or no drugs, alcohol or no alcohol involved, clothing description, type of clothing last seen in. Their weight, physical identifiers, etc, the who, what, when, where, why, and how of the case info.
I would then send in a search dog team to determine the following:
Is this really a missing person’s case or a homicide or suicide? Does it support the reporting persons statement or contradict it?
The search dog team if properly trained, can determine if this person was murdered and the scene was being compromised by the suspect(s) involved to cover up the murder.
I’ve helped solved several murders like this over the year. The Carlson’s in Battleground, Little Tommy Gibson who we were able to determine was killed by his father who was a deputy sheriff in Douglas County, Ore. And several others.
Anyway, if there are no signs of foul play, stress or death scent in and around the home, and point last seen.
Then the search dog team would determine (track the missing persons scent trail and determine if the victim walked on their own in a specific direct and got into a vehicle, on a bus, or was killed and their body ditched in the area or removed out of the area.
Depending on the search dog teams findings, I could then direct the detectives on how I would suggest they proceed from this point on. By then the police detectives would know
If this was a willful disappearance, or a kidnapping homicide case. Both need to be investigated very differently.
Do we bring in helicopters, more search dogs, cadaver dog teams, air scent teams, ground teams, and where do we use them. Do we set up containment?
By doing this I documented with the sheriff’s department a 97% success rate of finding the victim or finding out what really happened to the victim.
The bottom line is that I used my resources as I was trained to do properly.
Throughout the 25 years I learned that if I kept my mouth shut and turned the other way when a police dept screwed up and didn’t use their resources properly costing the missing person their life, I would be in with the “Good old boys” and all was well with the world.
At first of course when I saw this happen, I would complain to my superiors and they would just say, “Well Oakes, shit happens, it’s out of our control”.
I would argue that this needed to be changed so we, “the good old boys”, who were sworn to serve and protect” would provide the most professional teams and services to the public.
I would argue that we owed it to the missing person and his / her family and friends to do everything right.
After seeing several people lose their life because a certain sheriff’ refused to use a search dog or call in proper resources and it was all being covered up, I had had enough. Especially with the Nathen Madsen and Derrick Englebretson Case in Klamath County, Ore.
I could no longer just sit by and keep my mouth shut.
That’s why I then testified in the Oregon Legislature against the very departments I worked with and why I was promptly kicked out of the Oregon State Sheriff’s Association and State of Washington Dept of Emergency Management as an official resource.
I found that these sheriffs office SAR teams badmouthed me to make themselves look better. They badmouthed me to other sheriff’s depts., the victims families in hopes the victim’s family wouldn’t use me so that I wouldn’t show up the departments by finding the missing person when the police couldn’t or wouldn’t.
I still respect most law enforcement officials and their work. It’s a hard difficult job.
I respect the men and women who wear the badge. It’s when they abuse their authority that I have an issue and will stand up and take them on legally.
So after I went private in 1997, 13 years ago, I’ve found I have much more latitude as a private search team. Of course I have to obey all state laws and local rules and regulations regarding search and rescue, handling of evidence, and human remains etc.
But I also found out that many sheriffs feel threatened by my successes and have taken over the media controlling what the public hears about a specific case.
I can’t change that, nor will I. But what I do have control of is my own ethics and standards.
I still conduct my search and rescue operations with 100% documentation and ethics. This has protected me legally in and outside the courts of law. I’ve been able to bring closure or at least some answers to over 1,605 families. Through consulting as well as through actual search missions.
Most sheriffs appreciate my work. When they call me in, and some still do.
I work for them and make them look good.
If they refuse to call me in and we come in privately on behalf of the victim(s) family, I will do my job, report to the sheriff my findings, and if they become embarrassed because we found the victim in the original search area when their teams didn’t, couldn’t or wouldn’t, that’s not my issue, it’s theirs.
So do I regret my decision to go private?
No, I sleep well at night knowing that I’m giving the victim (missing person) and their family 100%.
No cover ups, no Good old boy BS, just the 100% work ethics I took an oath to perform and still live by today.
I get results and that’s all that matters.
Some of these sheriff’s could learn a lot by my methods. If they really wanted to.
So now maybe you as the general public can understand why I work privately and am not well liked by some departments.
If I wasn’t successful, I would be out of work. I’m still doing this job after 38 years.
So I guess what I’m doing works.
Respectfully
Mr. Oakes
Private Search and Rescue Coordinator
International K9 Search and Rescue Services
www.k9sardog.com
Harry Oakes and credibility
If a search dog handler finds one person through his or her career, this brings 100% credibility to their abilities. Credibility above reproach.
Here's the break down of my successful human searches. All documented, and all accepted in the courts of law.
Since 1986 I've received over 1,650 Missing Person Calls from around the world.
I've performed 103 Consulting cases re: the missing person calls.
I've performed 1,439 search and rescue missions regarding missing persons.
I've documented through law enforcement and the US Govt, 176 Direct live Finds of missing persons.
I've assisted the LE and Govt and private families in finding 130 live victims.
What this means is they turned to me and through my experience, expertise, and search dogs abilities we directed the govt, LE and private search teams to a particular area which helped them find the missing person alive.
I've located 304 humans dead. I've assisted the LE and Govt and private families in finding 70 dead victims.
What this means is they turned to me and through my experience, expertise, and search dogs abilities we directed the govt, LE and private search teams to a particular area which helped them find the missing person dead.
Total Finds and Assist Finds Humans 680
Again all these cases are documented by date, times, locations, names, places, agencies and have been reviewed by the Dept of justice, local law enforcement and other agencies and has been authenticated.
The remainder cases I've consulted on, worked on has been for evidence, missing pets, etc.
Respectfully
Mr. Harry Oakes
International K9 Search and Rescue Services
www.k9sardog.com
Finding one person alive or dead gives a search dog handler credibilityMonday, October 18, 2010
Here's the break down of my successful human searches. All documented, and all accepted in the courts of law.
Since 1986 I've received over 1,650 Missing Person Calls from around the world.
I've performed 103 Consulting cases re: the missing person calls.
I've performed 1,439 search and rescue missions regarding missing persons.
I've documented through law enforcement and the US Govt, 176 Direct live Finds of missing persons.
I've assisted the LE and Govt and private families in finding 130 live victims.
What this means is they turned to me and through my experience, expertise, and search dogs abilities we directed the govt, LE and private search teams to a particular area which helped them find the missing person alive.
I've located 304 humans dead. I've assisted the LE and Govt and private families in finding 70 dead victims.
What this means is they turned to me and through my experience, expertise, and search dogs abilities we directed the govt, LE and private search teams to a particular area which helped them find the missing person dead.
Total Finds and Assist Finds Humans 680
Again all these cases are documented by date, times, locations, names, places, agencies and have been reviewed by the Dept of justice, local law enforcement and other agencies and has been authenticated.
The remainder cases I've consulted on, worked on has been for evidence, missing pets, etc.
Respectfully
Mr. Harry Oakes
International K9 Search and Rescue Services
www.k9sardog.com
Finding one person alive or dead gives a search dog handler credibilityMonday, October 18, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)